NCLAT held that a Section 7 IBC application filed beyond three years from the date of default is time-barred, and pendency of DRT proceedings does not justify exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

Delhi High Court held that a company under winding up is liable to bear the Official Liquidator’s security expenses, as directors’ verified statements and undertakings are binding.

NCLAT Chennai held that applications dismissed for non-prosecution cannot be revived after dissolution, as recall would amount to an impermissible review under the IBC.

The Bombay High Court held that ownership under SARFAESI transfers only upon issuance of a sale certificate, and an interim moratorium under Section 96 IBC bars completion of an auction sale.

The NCLAT, Chennai Bench, held that a consequential appeal under the IBC is not maintainable once the foundational challenge is withdrawn and the resolution plan stands approved with the appellant’s participation.