top of page
Search


Supreme Court Reveals Attempt by Retired High Court Chief Justice to Influence NCLAT Judge; Accountability Now Rests with New CJI Surya Kant
The outgoing Chief Justice of India disclosed that a retired High Court Chief Justice had attempted to influence a judicial member of the NCLAT in a corporate matter. As the implicated judge retired before a formal inquiry could be commenced, the issue has been placed before the new CJI Surya Kant for administrative action.
Nov 24, 20253 min read


IBBI Issues Second Guidelines for Preparation of Panel of Insolvency Professionals for Appointments from January to June 2026
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India on 21 November 2025 issued the Second Guidelines for preparing a structured panel of Insolvency Professionals for appointments from January to June 2026. The framework standardises eligibility, zonal distribution, AFA validity, sorting criteria, and acceptance obligations, aiming to reduce delays and strengthen the efficiency of appointments under the IBC.
Nov 22, 20255 min read


IBBI Issues Draft Guidelines to Standardise Valuation Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
The IBBI issued draft guidelines on 19 November 2025 to standardise valuation under the IBC, introducing uniform documentation requirements and asset-specific valuation formats to enhance transparency, consistency, and reliability in insolvency proceedings. Stakeholder comments are invited until 10 December 2025.
Nov 21, 20254 min read


Supreme Court Strikes Down 25-Year Experience Requirement for Chartered Accountants as Tribunal Members
The Supreme Court clarified that Chartered Accountants cannot be required to possess 25 years of experience to be eligible for appointment as Technical Members in tribunals, declaring the requirement unconstitutional and extending parity with earlier rulings concerning advocates.
Nov 20, 20253 min read


NCLAT Holds: Shortlisted PRA Who Failed to Submit Plan Has No Locus to Challenge CoC-Approved Resolution Plan
The Appellate Tribunal held that a PRA who fails to submit a plan within time loses locus to challenge CoC decisions, and only timely, substantively relevant objections may be considered under Section 31 scrutiny.
Nov 20, 20254 min read
bottom of page