The Supreme Court Collegium, on 1 September 2025, recommended the appointment of 26 individuals as judges of the Allahabad High Court, including four women and a balanced representation from the Bar and judiciary.

In a judgment pronounced today, the Supreme Court ruled that revisional courts cannot recall summoning orders in Section 138 NI Act cases and clarified that SICA protection cannot shield against cheque dishonour prosecutions.

In an order passed today, NCLAT New Delhi ruled that repeated Section 94 IBC petitions after prior dismissal amount to misuse of the insolvency process and cannot stall SARFAESI recovery or invoke moratorium.

NCLAT New Delhi held that a defective affidavit under Section 7 IBC does not invalidate the petition and must be allowed to be rectified before rejection.

NCLAT Delhi held that a successful bidder in liquidation is entitled only to operational reliefs; excessive statutory, tax, or regulatory claims cannot be granted merely by acquisition.

Bombay High Court ruled that IBC resolution plans cannot limit SRA’s statutory powers under the Slum Act, affirming the authority to replace defaulting developers.

Bombay High Court held that assignment of stressed loans to operational creditors is unlawful under RBI norms and that CPC compromises cannot validate agreements prohibited by law.

MP High Court ruled that Section 94 IBC cannot be invoked by personal guarantors of sole proprietorship or partnership firms, validating SARFAESI recovery proceedings.

Gujarat High Court ruled that approval of an IBC resolution plan extinguishes all pre-existing tax liabilities, overriding the Income Tax Department’s powers under Section 263.

Delhi High Court stayed IBBI’s disciplinary order against an insolvency professional, holding that violation of natural justice and possible bias warranted judicial intervention at this stage.