The Punjab & Haryana High Court held that a prior SARFAESI mortgage and auction sale could not be defeated by a subsequent State revenue attachment in the absence of a statutory first charge before Section 26E.

The Supreme Court held that forfeiture in a liquidation sale is lawful where a bidder accepts an extension of time subject to forfeiture and later defaults, as such forfeiture flows from statutory powers under the IBC.

The NCLAT held that joint meetings for considering repayment plans of personal guarantors do not amount to group insolvency where each plan is independently examined and rejected on commercial grounds.

The Kerala High Court stayed a liquidation auction after holding that valuation of plant and machinery by an ineligible valuer was prima facie unsustainable under the valuation rules.

The NCLAT held that a belatedly filed homebuyer claim cannot be ignored where the allotment and payments are reflected in the Corporate Debtor’s records, and such liabilities must be considered through an addendum to the resolution plan prior to its approval.

The High Court permitted a one-time ex-gratia welfare payment to Company Paid Staff of the Official Liquidator from surplus Common Pool Funds, holding that such equitable relief was permissible where no creditor interest was prejudiced and no precedent was created.

Continuous default beyond ninety days justifies NPA classification, and borrower’s express consent to auction operates as waiver, barring subsequent SARFAESI challenges.

CIRP claims earlier rejected as time-barred cannot be reopened on remand, as limitation finality and strict IBC timelines prevail; prospective Regulation 13(1B) amendments do not create new rights.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that the DRT and its Recovery Officer cannot impose overseas travel restrictions without statutory authority. Since the 1993 Act contains no provision permitting curtailment of the right to travel abroad, such conditions violate Articles 19 and 21 and are unconstitutional.

In a significant clarification on homebuyer rights under the IBC, NCLAT ruled that once a resolution plan is remanded to the CoC, the earlier approval stands nullified. The Adjudicating Authority must independently examine all pending homebuyer claims, and rejection based solely on the previous CoC approval is contrary to the remand directions and legally untenable.